Prominent Conservative Voice Urges Removal of President Trump Over War Escalation
Washington, Sunday, 27 September 2026.
Former ally Tucker Carlson called for invoking the 25th Amendment against President Donald Trump following nuclear threats toward Iran, revealing Trump’s alarming private remark, “we all die anyway.”
Conservative Commentator Calls for Removal
Prominent conservative commentator Tucker Carlson has publicly argued that President Donald Trump’s Cabinet should invoke the 25th Amendment to remove him from office following heightened foreign policy tensions and threats regarding Iran [1]. This public rift between key populist media figures and the administration underscores mounting domestic political friction, introducing fresh policy uncertainty for corporate leadership and markets assessing geopolitical risk in the Middle East [2]. Carlson made these remarks during an interview published on September 24, 2026, stating that Trump should have been removed from office immediately when he threatened nuclear war [5]. The commentator characterized the threat of offensive nuclear weapon use as threatening the destruction of humanity, labeling it a crime greater than corruption charges [1].
Conservative Commentator Calls for Removal
In response to Carlson’s comments, the White House pointed to a Truth Social post from April in which President Trump criticized Carlson and other MAGA voices critical of the president as stupid people [1]. Carlson recounted a specific Oval Office meeting before the conflict began where he claims Trump admitted the risks of war but stated, in the end we all die anyway, so it doesn’t matter [2]. This alleged remark shocked Carlson, who described the sentiment as nihilism and the last thing any leader should display [5]. The former Fox News host emphasized that Trump should have been bundled up and taken out, asserting there is no greater crime than threatening the destruction of humanity [4].
Legal and Constitutional Mechanisms
Carlson confirmed that he believed Trump should have been pushed out through the 25th Amendment, which allows the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet to declare a president unable to discharge the powers and duties of the office [1]. No president has ever been stripped of power through this provision, though it has been used for temporary power transfers during medical procedures for leaders such as Ronald Reagan and Joe Biden [3]. The amendment’s Section 4 is the specific mechanism cited for removal due to incapacity, distinct from impeachment proceedings which address high crimes and misdemeanors [3]. Lawmakers and officials have floated invoking the 25th Amendment against Trump dating back to his first term, indicating a recurring theme in political discourse surrounding his presidency [1].
Legal and Constitutional Mechanisms
Calls to invoke the 25th Amendment grew in April among House Democrats and MAGA figures alike after Trump’s civilization threat, though the White House called the efforts at the time pathetic [1]. Carlson noted that while Democrats might attempt to punish the president on corruption or whatever, the foreign policy decisions warrant immediate removal [5]. He urged not simply the vice president, but every member of the cabinet to march into the president’s office and demand that he renounce his statements calling for the use or threatening the use of nuclear weapons [5]. If the president refuses, Carlson stated that cabinet members should quit, highlighting the severity of the constitutional crisis perceived by the commentator [5].
Geopolitical Implications and Market Risk
The context of these remarks involves heightened tensions where Trump threatened to annihilate the country and warned a whole civilization will die tonight amid negotiations in April 2026 [1]. Carlson claims that last week, specifically around September 16, 2026, Saudi forces were routed in Yemen, resulting in Houthi control over the entrance to the Red Sea [5]. He alleges that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman requested help from Trump twice but was denied, complicating the geopolitical landscape further [5]. The United States recently confirmed a transfer of 40,000 units of 2,000-pound bombs to Israel, which Carlson characterizes as a gift rather than an arms sale [5].
Geopolitical Implications and Market Risk
Carlson asserts that the scale of the bomb transfer is hard for the modern mind to comprehend, noting the total destructive force is six times that of the Little Boy atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima in August 1945 [5]. He claims the war is being pushed by Israel with aims including regional hegemony and diminishing the power of the Gulf Cooperation Council states [5]. This escalation introduces significant uncertainty for markets assessing geopolitical risk, as the rift between populist media figures and the administration deepens [2]. Carlson expressed that he had warned Trump four days before the war started that the United States would be kicked out of the Gulf, a prediction he claims the president dismissed with indifference [5].